Due Diligence in the Construction Industry

Due Diligence in the Construction Industry

Welcome to our comprehensive exploration of Due Diligence in the realm of construction and property development. This blog post is designed to provide an in-depth understanding of the multifaceted aspects of Due Diligence, a critical area for professionals in the industry, especially those preparing for RICS APC.

We delve into the intricacies of Fund Monitoring, the nuances of conducting Feasibility Studies, and the complexities of Planning and Building Regulatory Control. Our discussion extends to evaluating the Suitability of Teams and Procurement Routes, navigating the Tendering process, and understanding Contractual Arrangements. We also examine the significance of Third-Party Rights, the importance of a suitable Programme, the dynamics of Cash Flows, and the criticality of Interim Payments and Draw-Downs.

Furthermore, we will dissect the process of preparing Final Accounts and the overarching theme of Risk management in construction projects. This post aims to equip you with the knowledge and insights necessary for effective Due Diligence in today's challenging construction environment.

This post pivots around the following key points:

• Fund monitoring

• Feasibility study

• Planning and building regulatory control

• Suitability of team

• Suitability of procurement route

• Tendering

• Contractual arrangements

• Third-party rights

• Suitability of programme

• Cash flows

• Interim payments

• Draw-down

• Final accounts

• Risk

Project Monitoring on management style contracts

Project Monitoring in management style contracts, particularly within the context of Due Diligence for RICS APC candidates, involves a comprehensive oversight role. This role includes advising on various aspects such as land and property acquisition, and statutory compliance, as outlined in RICS standards.

The project monitor acts as a guardian of the client's interests, ensuring that the project aligns with the agreed objectives, budget, and timeline. They must be vigilant in identifying risks and advising on mitigation strategies. This role is crucial in management style contracts where the management contractor coordinates separate works contractors, and the project monitor ensures that each component aligns with the overall project strategy.

The RICS guidance notes provide a framework for this role, emphasizing the importance of adherence to UK laws and regulations in property and construction projects. These guidelines ensure that project monitors maintain high professional standards and effectively manage the complexities inherent in management style contracts [1].

Fund Monitoring

Project Fund Monitoring, as part of the Due Diligence area of competence for RICS APC candidates, involves a detailed and systematic approach to overseeing and reporting on the financial aspects of construction projects.

This role is critical in ensuring that the project remains within budget and adheres to the agreed financial parameters. According to RICS standards, a Project Fund Monitor's responsibilities include assessing the project structure, identifying and managing conflicts of interest, and conducting technical due diligence [3]. They are also involved in overseeing financial close/contract completion and ensuring practical compliance with the project's financial aspects.

The RICS Guidance Note on Project Monitoring provides a comprehensive framework for these responsibilities, ensuring alignment with UK laws and industry best practices [2]. This role is pivotal in safeguarding the interests of stakeholders, particularly funders, by providing regular, accurate reports and insights into the project's financial health, as per the RICS Project Monitoring Guidance Notes [4].

Feasibility Study

A Feasibility Study, in the context of Due Diligence for RICS APC candidates, is a critical evaluation process aimed at assessing the viability of a proposed project or development.

This study is fundamental in guiding decision-making processes, particularly in the realms of commercial real estate and construction. It involves a thorough analysis of legal, economic, technological, and scheduling factors. RICS APC candidates are expected to have a comprehensive understanding of how to conduct these studies, which includes an in-depth knowledge of relevant legislation and professional due diligence practices [6].

The study typically encompasses project feasibility analysis and risk management, ensuring that all potential risks are identified and strategies for mitigation are developed. This aligns with the RICS guidance on technical due diligence, which is a crucial reference for building surveying candidates and those involved in property acquisition [5].

Understanding and applying these principles in feasibility studies are essential for ensuring that projects are not only compliant with UK laws but also viable and sustainable in the long term.

You can also refer to my blog post about Feasibility study in the construction industry and how this is related to APC candidates through visiting the following link: https://www.apcmasterypath.co.uk/project-feasibility-analysis.

Planning and building regulatory control

Planning and Building Regulatory Control is a crucial aspect of the Due Diligence area for RICS APC candidates, encompassing a broad range of regulations and standards that govern the construction and use of buildings.

In the UK, this regulatory framework is primarily defined by the Building Regulations 2010, which set minimum standards for design, construction, and alterations to buildings [7]. These regulations are essential for ensuring safety, health, environmental performance, and accessibility in building projects. Additionally, the planning system under the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) in England plays a significant role, with RICS providing guidance on assessing viability in planning [8].

RICS APC candidates must understand these regulations and frameworks, as they are integral to the professional practice of surveying, ensuring compliance, and managing risks associated with property development and construction. Knowledge of these regulations is not only a requirement for professional competency but also crucial for the proactive management of regulatory procedures in the surveying profession [9].

Suitability of team

The concept of "Suitability of Team" is an essential component in the Due Diligence area for RICS APC candidates, focusing on the importance of assembling a team with the appropriate skills, knowledge, and experience to successfully deliver a project. This involves evaluating the qualifications, expertise, and track record of each team member to ensure they align with the project's specific requirements.

RICS standards emphasize the need for due diligence in team selection, which includes understanding the legal and ethical responsibilities of team members, particularly in relation to health and safety as per the laws in England, Wales, and Scotland [10]. This scrutiny is crucial not only for compliance with legal standards but also for the efficient and effective management of the project. The suitability of the team directly impacts the project's success, influencing aspects such as project delivery, risk management, and overall quality of work.

Therefore, RICS APC candidates must be adept at assessing team suitability, ensuring that the team's composition supports the project's goals and adheres to professional and regulatory standards.

Suitability of procurement route

The Suitability of Procurement Route is a critical consideration in the Due Diligence process for RICS APC candidates. It involves selecting the most appropriate procurement strategy for a construction project, based on a comprehensive understanding of the project's specific requirements, goals, and constraints.

RICS provides guidance to help professionals choose a suitable procurement route, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of different strategies [11]. This decision is pivotal in determining the project's overall success, influencing factors such as cost, quality, time, and risk management. For instance, a two-stage procurement route might be more suitable for complex projects where a more collaborative approach is needed to avoid a siloed execution of the project [12]. The choice of procurement route must align with the legal and regulatory framework in the UK, ensuring compliance and effective project delivery.

Understanding these nuances is essential for RICS APC candidates, as it enables them to provide informed advice to clients and ensure that projects are executed efficiently and effectively.

Tendering 

The Suitability of Tendering Strategies is a vital consideration in the Due Diligence process for RICS APC candidates, focusing on selecting the most appropriate tendering method for construction projects. This decision significantly influences the project's cost-effectiveness, quality, and timeline. RICS provides detailed guidance on tendering strategies, emphasizing the importance of aligning the tendering process with the project's specific needs and objectives [13].

For example, in a large-scale public sector project, adherence to OJEU tendering regulations is crucial, requiring a transparent and competitive tendering process [14]. In contrast, a private sector project might opt for a more flexible, negotiated tendering approach, allowing for closer collaboration with the contractor.

The choice of strategy should consider factors such as the complexity of the project, time constraints, and the client's risk appetite. This knowledge is essential for RICS APC candidates to ensure that they can advise on the most suitable tendering approach, considering legal requirements and best practice standards in the UK construction industry.

Contractual arrangements

Contractual Arrangements are a fundamental aspect of Due Diligence for RICS APC candidates, encompassing the legal agreements that define the roles, responsibilities, and rights of parties involved in construction projects. These arrangements are crucial for ensuring that all parties are clear about their obligations and the project's expectations.

The RICS 'Black Book' provides comprehensive guidance on good technical practice for quantity surveying and construction professionals, including aspects of contract administration [15]. For instance, in a real-life scenario, a construction contract might detail the project's scope, timelines, payment schedules, and mechanisms for dispute resolution. This guidance note also covers the completion of construction works under various contracts, highlighting the importance of understanding different contract types and their implications [16].

Knowledge of these contractual arrangements is vital for RICS APC candidates to ensure that projects are managed effectively, risks are mitigated, and legal compliance is maintained throughout the construction process.

Third party rights

Third-party rights are a significant aspect of Due Diligence for RICS APC candidates, particularly in the context of property development and construction. These rights refer to the interests or claims that third parties may have in a property, which can impact development projects.

A key example in UK law is the Party Wall etc. Act 1996. This Act provides rights to a Building Owner to carry out work on an existing party wall, but also imposes obligations to notify and protect the interests of adjoining property owners [17].

For instance, if a developer plans to construct a new building or undertake excavations near a shared boundary, they must follow procedures set out in the Act to avoid disputes. Understanding these rights is crucial for surveyors to advise their clients accurately on potential legal implications and to ensure that the necessary agreements or notices are in place to respect the rights of all parties involved and to comply with legal requirements.

Suitability of Programme

The Suitability of Programme is a crucial aspect of Due Diligence for RICS APC candidates, focusing on the appropriateness and effectiveness of a project's schedule or programme. This involves assessing whether the timeline for a project is realistic, aligns with client objectives, and accommodates all necessary stages of the project, from inception to completion.

For instance, in a commercial property development, the programme must consider factors like planning permissions, design phases, construction time, and potential delays. RICS guidance notes, particularly on technical due diligence of commercial property, provide essential insights into how to evaluate these factors effectively [5]. The programme should also comply with relevant UK laws and regulations, ensuring that all legal requirements are met within the stipulated timeframes.

For RICS APC candidates, understanding how to assess and advise on the suitability of a programme is key to ensuring that projects are delivered efficiently, within budget, and to the client's satisfaction.

Cashflows

Cashflows are a critical element in the Due Diligence process for RICS APC candidates, particularly in the context of property investment and development. Cashflow forecasting involves predicting the inflow and outflow of cash in a project, allowing for effective financial planning and risk management.

RICS provides specific guidance on cash flow forecasting, emphasizing its importance in assessing progress on construction sites and in the broader context of commercial property investments [18], [19].

For example, in a real estate development project, cash flow forecasts help in determining the feasibility of the project, scheduling payments to contractors, and ensuring adequate funding is available at each stage of the project. Accurate cash flow forecasting is crucial for maintaining the financial health of a project and avoiding liquidity issues.

It is also essential for RICS APC candidates to understand the principles of discounted cash flow (DCF) valuation, as it is a key method used in the valuation of property investments, aligning with UK valuation standards.

Interim payments

Interim Payments are a key component in construction project management and an important area of focus for RICS APC candidates. These are payments made to contractors at regular intervals, typically monthly, based on the value of work completed and materials on site. The RICS guidance on Interim Valuations and Payment provides a framework for understanding the conditions of contract, payment mechanisms, and the valuation process [20].

For example, in a large-scale construction project, interim payments help maintain cash flow for the contractor, ensuring that work progresses according to the project schedule. This practice is not only a financial imperative but also a legal requirement in many contracts, as outlined in standard forms like JCT contracts [21].

Understanding the principles and practices of interim payments is crucial for surveyors to ensure effective cash flow management and to mitigate financial risks in construction projects.

Draw-down

Draw-down in the context of construction and project financing is a critical concept for RICS APC candidates to understand as part of their Due Diligence competence.

Draw-down refers to the process of accessing funds from a loan or financing agreement in stages, rather than receiving the full amount upfront. This method is commonly used in construction projects where funds are released to the contractor at different stages of the project, often linked to the completion of certain milestones or phases [22].

For example, a construction company may receive a portion of the project funding after completing the foundation work, with subsequent draw-downs following the completion of structural framing, roofing, and final finishes. This approach helps in managing cash flow efficiently and ensures that funds are used appropriately for the intended purposes at each stage of the project.

Understanding draw-down processes and their implications is essential for surveyors in advising clients on financial planning and risk management in construction projects.

Final accounts

Final Accounts in the context of construction and surveying, as covered in the RICS APC, refer to the final financial statement of account between the contracting parties at the conclusion of a construction project. This account details the total cost of the project, reconciling the initial contract sum with any adjustments due to variations, claims, or additional works [5].

For example, in a commercial building project, the Final Account would include the original contract sum, costs of additional works requested by the client, variations due to unforeseen circumstances, and any penalties or bonuses related to project performance. The process of preparing and agreeing on the Final Account is crucial, as it ensures that all financial aspects of the project are settled, and any disputes are resolved. RICS provides guidance on this process, emphasizing the importance of accuracy, transparency, and adherence to contractual terms[1].

Understanding the principles and practices of preparing Final Accounts is essential for RICS APC candidates, as it demonstrates their competence in managing the financial closure of construction projects, in line with UK laws and industry standards.

Risks

In the context of Due Diligence for RICS APC candidates, understanding and managing risks is paramount. Risks in property and construction can be multifaceted, encompassing financial, legal, environmental, and operational aspects.

The RICS guidance on risk management provides a comprehensive framework for identifying and mitigating these risks, emphasizing the need for in-depth knowledge of legislation, professional due diligence, insurance, investment, and all sectors of risk management [25], [26].

For instance, in a commercial property development, risks might include cost overruns due to unforeseen ground conditions, delays in obtaining planning permissions, or potential litigation from contractual disputes. Effective risk management involves not only recognizing these risks but also implementing strategies to mitigate them, such as thorough contract review, regular site inspections, and maintaining comprehensive insurance coverage. This approach aligns with the RICS guidance and UK laws, ensuring that surveyors uphold their professional duty to manage risks effectively, thereby protecting their clients and the public [23],[24].

Real-life examples, such as the financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on construction projects, highlight the importance of robust risk management practices in adapting to unforeseen challenges and ensuring project continuity.

Recap

In conclusion, the realm of Due Diligence in construction and property development is a complex tapestry of various critical components, each playing a pivotal role in the success of a project. From the initial stages of Fund Monitoring and Feasibility Studies to the detailed processes of Planning and Regulatory Control, every aspect demands meticulous attention and expertise.

The Suitability of Teams and Procurement Routes, along with effective Tendering strategies and robust Contractual Arrangements, form the backbone of project execution. Additionally, understanding Third-Party Rights, ensuring a suitable Programme, managing Cash Flows, and navigating Interim Payments and Draw-Downs are essential for financial stability. The culmination of these efforts in preparing Final Accounts and the continuous assessment of Risks underscores the importance of Due Diligence as a critical skill set for professionals in this field.

This blog post has aimed to provide a thorough understanding of these elements, offering valuable insights for those embarking on or advancing in their careers in construction and property development.

🌐 Sources

1. [isurv.com - Document downloads - RICS standards](https://www.isurv.com/downloads/176/rics_standards)

2. [isurv.com - Document downloads - Project monitoring](https://www.isurv.com/downloads/208/project_monitoring)

3. [rics.org - Lender's Independent Monitoring Surveyor, 1st edition](https://www.rics.org/profession-standards/rics-standards-and-guidance/sector-standards/construction-standards/black-book/lenders-independent-monitoring-surveyor)

4. [lambertsurv.co.uk - Project Monitoring](https://lambertsurv.co.uk/our-services/building-consultancy/project-monitoring/)

5. [property-elite.co.uk - Hot Topic Highlight – RICS Guidance Note Technical Due Diligence of Commercial Property 1st edition](https://www.property-elite.co.uk/post/hot-topic-highlight-rics-guidance-note-technical-due-diligence-of-commercial-property-1st-edition)

6. [rics.org - Sector pathways](https://www.rics.org/join-rics/sector-pathways)

7. [ww3.rics.org - An A–Z of legal and regulatory compliance for APC](https://ww3.rics.org/uk/en/journals/built-environment-journal/apc-legal-regulatory-compliance-core-building-surveying-competency.html)

8. [rics.org - Assessing viability in planning under the National Planning Policy Framework 2019 for England, RICS guidance note, 1st edition](https://www.rics.org/profession-standards/rics-standards-and-guidance/sector-standards/land-standards/assessing-viability-in-planning-under-the-national-planning-policy-framework-2019-for-england-rics-guidance-note-1st-edition)

9. [rics.org - Regulatory Rules](https://www.rics.org/regulation/how-we-regulate/our-regulatory-rules-and-procedures)

10. [rics.org - RICS Standards and Guidance](https://www.rics.org/profession-standards/rics-standards-and-guidance)

11. [isurv.com - Document downloads - Procurement strategies](https://www.isurv.com/downloads/65/procurement_strategies)

12. [fticonsulting.com - The Importance of Selecting a Procurement](https://www.fticonsulting.com/insights/articles/importance-appropriate-procurement-contracting-construction)

13. [rics.org - Tendering Strategies, 1st edition](https://www.rics.org/profession-standards/rics-standards-and-guidance/sector-standards/construction-standards/black-book/tendering-strategies)

14. [coursehero.com - Tendering Strategies.pdf - RICS guidance note RICS...](https://www.coursehero.com/file/199131453/Tendering-Strategiespdf/)

15. [rics.org - RICS QS & Construction Practice Information (Black Book)](https://www.rics.org/profession-standards/rics-standards-and-guidance/sector-standards/construction-standards/black-book)

16. [isurv.com - Document downloads - Contract administration case law](https://www.isurv.com/downloads/333/contract_administration_case_law)

17. [gov.uk - The Party Wall etc Act 1996: explanatory booklet](https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/preventing-and-resolving-disputes-in-relation-to-party-walls/the-party-wall-etc-act-1996-explanatory-booklet)

18. [isurv.com - Cash flow forecasting – UK (ARCHIVED)](https://www.isurv.com/downloads/download/1384/cash_flow_forecasting_%E2%80%93_uk_archived)

19. [rics.org - Discounted cash flow (DCF) valuation](https://www.rics.org/profession-standards/rics-standards-and-guidance/sector-standards/valuation-standards/discounted-cash-flow-valuation)

20. [rics.org - Interim Valuations and Payment, 1st edition](https://www.rics.org/profession-standards/rics-standards-and-guidance/sector-standards/construction-standards/black-book/interim-valuations-and-payment)

21. [corporate.jctltd.co.uk - JCT Explains…Interim Payments](https://corporate.jctltd.co.uk/jct-explains-interim-payments/)

22. [buildertrend.com - The construction draw process (best practices + challenges)](https://buildertrend.com/blog/construction-draw-process/)

23. [rics.org - Risk, Liability and Insurance, 1st edition](https://www.rics.org/profession-standards/rics-standards-and-guidance/conduct-competence/risk-liability-and-insurance)

24. [rics.org - Management of Risk, 1st edition](https://www.rics.org/profession-standards/rics-standards-and-guidance/sector-standards/construction-standards/black-book/management-of-risk)

25. [RICS - Sector pathways](https://www.rics.org/join-rics/sector-pathways)

26. [RICS - Construction Standards Black Book](https://www.rics.org/profession-standards/rics-standards-and-guidance/sector-standards/construction-standards/black-book)